Thanks Guy. Smaller increments would be good for us so
a) we can dial up performance in smaller steps without needing to double the spend. This would also encourage us to spend more because we're more likely to stretch for an extra 25 DTUs, for example, than a larger step up.
b) we can set finer-grained performance thresholds, e.g. have a 150-DTU pool but set the per-db max at 100 so one db can't hog all the resources. Right now with a 125-DTU pool I have no control over the max DTU per database because the settings available
are either 0 or 125.
c) we can tune the DTU allocation based on load requirements over time.
Granularity of at least 25 DTUs would be good.
thanks,
Rory