BTW! "... and mounted those file hierarcies below. 5 reparse points" so I my case I had consolidated the users Space into 5 overall concepts on 1 volume each. In that way I had already reduced my use of volumes.
So for now I can add a drive letter to each for trying to make Windows Search work.
But guess I am going to stumble into the same issue then with Windows Search not supporting resparse points again ....because some of the volumes are deduped.
Great experience as ever working with file virtualization in the Windows client, i.e. Liberaries. Just wonder why the heck MS did not improove that experience ...
Right now, with Server 2012, find myself "hacking" again this year 2013 ... to try and make Windows work on some basic issues. All the Flex is starting to go away now ... here comes reality ... NOT WORKING.
NTFS resparse points, long file names, etc. Great Flex! However in theory only. For real when everything is pulled together and the system receives its more or less complete configuration ... unsupported in Windows. Go hack it.
Please stop doing just components test ... and do complete flight tests also. More hollistic tests please across constraints! With a focus in each test ... from 0 to a fully configured system.
How can no support in Windows Search for resparse points in NTFS be a miss during introduction of libraries (Windows 7/2008 R2) and now during introduction of data deduplication (Windows 8/2012) ... during just internal tests at MS? And we all have to use
libraries (thus a remote Windows Search index on remote shares in a domain setup) ... and now Windows 8 WinRT is even more dependent on libraries? How can that be overlooked - or such a basic thing receive no priority - and just get skipped? How can that happen?
-
Edited by
Computermensch
Friday, March 08, 2013 12:52 PM