Thanks EJ, your pptx was quite informative, but I couldn't honestly still find the simple answer to my question to be honest.
Basically here is my dilemma:
Do I purchase 4 SSDs @ 400GB each or do I purchase 4 SSDs @ 200GB each?
To make my decision, I kinda just need to know how big either of those SSD tiers would be? Is it like a RAID5 with 1 drive fault tolerance where I "lose" 1 drive for 600GB vs 1200GB? Or is it more like a RAID10 with 1 drive fault tolerance for
400GB vs 800GB?
Or is it something else?
I understand I should be having JBODs and I should be calculcating this from a performance point over a storage size point. But with my existing infrastructure to minimize cost, this is what I have to work with.
Obviously bigger is better, but if I can get away with 4x200GB on the SSDs thats saving a lot of cost, but I can't make that decision without know what usable space I get out of those 4 disks on the SSD tier. If all I get is 200GB from the 4 (200GB) disks,
than thats not enough and I need the 4x400GB SSDs. If I get 400GB thats borderline and if I get 600GB from the 4x200GB disks than thats great, I can save on costs to get those.