Please let me know if this is posted in the correct forum.
We have a single server running Windows Server 2012 R2 Standard. Intel Xeon E3-1225 CPU with 8GB of ram. Maximum of 10 users on the local network.
Running it in a workgroup setting right now. 4 500GB hard drives, three in a RAID-5 setup, and the fourth as a hot spare.
Currently have two NICs in the server. 1st one is the on-board Intel I217-LM 1.0 Gbps NIC/Port. 2nd one is an HP NC112T PCIe Gigabit Server Adapter, currently running at 100 Mbps, for some reason.
(I've downloaded the most recent drivers for the HP NIC, and will update them when I have a chance.) Not really using the HP NIC at this point, as I have not set up Remote Access Server yet, which was the original reason for the purchase of the HP NIC.
The server is currently running our dental office practice management system, a Sybase-based database, and is functioning as a Remote Desktop Server for access to the practice management system from our satellite offices. We have at most 3 users connected to the Remote Desktop Server at any one time.
I would like to make use of Hyper-V so I can set up Active Directory, as managing RDS is much easier under Active Directory than via a workgroup setting. In reading the "Mastering Windows Server 2012 R2" book I've got, I see that two NICs are recommended for HyperV, one for use by the VMs, and one for the HyperV host. I also see that Remote Access Server (VPN, etc) is easier to set up and manage with two NICs.
My question is: How many NICs do I need for this scenario? 2, 3, or 4?