Windows Server 2003 Enterprise is a successor of Windows 2000 Advanced Server. Is that true? Windows Server 2003 has a similar architecture like Windows Server 2000. Is that true? If I want to isolate some users, but I want the possibility that those users can log in (directory LocalUser), I have to create a new subdirectory called... Public? Or? If I install / configure some services like DNS or WINS server, is there a possibility that those new configured services can have a higher priority than DHCP?

Hi, Thank you for the post. Yes, Windows Server 2003 was released as an upgrade to Windows 2000 Server. For more information, you may read this document: http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc773240(v=ws.10).aspx Regards,Nick Gu - MSFT

Hi, Thank you for the post. Yes, Windows Server 2003 was released as an upgrade to Windows 2000 Server. For more information, you may read this document: http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc773240(v=ws.10).aspx Regards,Nick Gu - MSFT