Is there any way we can find number of concurrent user accessing the mails using OWA and MAPI

What Exchange version are you running?[string](0..33|%{[char][int](46+("686552495351636652556262185355647068516270555358646562655775 0645570").substring(($_*2),2))})-replace " "

Hi, For Exchange 2010: The Get-LogonStatistics cmdlet retrieves logon information about currently active sessions. On Mailbox servers only, you can use the Get-LogonStatistics cmdlet without parameters. In this case, the cmdlet returns the logon statistics for all mailboxes on all databases on the local server. Note:Users who log on to their mailboxes using Microsoft Office Outlook Web App aren't continually connected to the Mailbox server. An Outlook Web App client connects to the server, performs tasks, and then disconnects from the server. Therefore, you may see few or no logon statistics for Outlook Web App, even if users are logged on with this client. For Exchange 2003: http://www.msexchange.org/tutorials/microsoft-exchange-server-user-monitor.html Hope it helps. Best Regards!Please remember to click Mark as Answer on the post that helps you, and to click Unmark as Answer if a marked post does not actually answer your question. This can be beneficial to other community members reading the thread.

@Jidan Its showing all the sessions in the day, not the active sessions Regards Gulshan Kathuria

Hi GKathur, Yes it is possible through an Exmon utilities.. it can show you how many user are connected to Exchange , if you want to be specfic for OWA user then just go to "Byclienmon" tab and see the protocl "w3wp.exe" which will tell you about OWA users. Here is the url for the same tool:- http://www.microsoft.com/download/en/details.aspx?displaylang=en&id=11461 Installation:- 1) Just double click on it install it. 2) Go to program file (x86) ---> then Exchange User monitor folder---> double click on Exmon.exe to run the tool. Thanks Amit Rawat

Hi, You can use Pefrmon (Performance Monitor tool) to see the all connected users counts like owa lights, owa premimum, etc.... Thanks, Vidyanand