2007 to 2013 cross forest migration

Hopefully someone can give me some advice. I am trying to run a mailbox move from Exchange 2007 to 2013 in a different forest. The issue I am having is when I try to run the command new-moverequest on the Exchange 2007 management shell it is failing with 'new-moverequest is not an available cmdlet, function, script file, or operable program'

I think it may be a permission issue but cant see where to apply the necessary permissions. I am logging in as a domain admin that looks like it has everything it requires.

Could someone please advise where to look for the correct permisions.

Thanks
July 12th, 2015 11:35pm

There is a detailed walk-through here about mailbox moves in general from different versions of Exchange, with a particular emphasis on cross-forest moves. Once you download the presentation, turn to page 43 for your exact case.

Summarizing: you'll first have to create a mail-enabled user object, (optionally) run ADMT and only then use New-MoveRequest in the target organization. Only pull moves are supported in your case, and you cannot use a push move (eg initiating the move from the 2007 org).

As for the permissions, fastest way would be to add your account to "Organization Management". The long way: by default 2 role management groups are assigned permissions for New-MoveRequest, Organization Management and Recipient Management, as stated here (section Mailbox move and migration permissions). Aside from these, you can create a custom RBAC role assignment and assign it the Mailbox moves role.

Free Windows Admin Tool Kit Click here and download it now
July 13th, 2015 1:24am

Beside the above given suggestion, you can also checkout this another informative article that covers the same area in order to get rid from such weird issue and perform a swing migration job in flawless manner.

Understanding management roles

Here is another article from Technet team that provides step-wise instructions to accomplish this job by checking all the required prerequisites.

As an alternative, to migrate users mailboxes from Exchange 2007 to 2013, you may also consider on this automated solution http://www.exchange2007to2013migration.exchangemigrationtool.com/ that seems to be a good approach in order to get this job done without interruption.

Hope it helps you!
July 13th, 2015 3:12am

There is a detailed walk-through here about mailbox moves in general from different versions of Exchange, with a particular emphasis on cross-forest moves. Once you download the presentation, turn to page 43 for your exact case.

Summarizing: you'll first have to create a mail-enabled user object, (optionally) run ADMT and only then use New-MoveRequest in the target organization. Only pull moves are supported in your case, and you cannot use a push move (eg initiating the move from the 2007 org).

As for the permissions, fastest way would be to add your account to "Organization Management". The long way: by default 2 role management groups are assigned permissions for New-MoveRequest, Organization Management and Recipient Management, as stated here (section Mailbox move and migration permissions). Aside from these, you can create a custom RBAC role assignment and assign it the Mailbox moves role.

Free Windows Admin Tool Kit Click here and download it now
July 13th, 2015 5:23am

Beside the above given suggestion, you can also checkout this another informative article that covers the same area in order to get rid from such weird issue and perform a swing migration job in flawless manner.

Understanding management roles

Here is another article from Technet team that provides step-wise instructions to accomplish this job by checking all the required prerequisites.

As an alternative, to migrate users mailboxes from Exchange 2007 to 2013, you may also consider on this automated solution http://www.exchange2007to2013migration.exchangemigrationtool.com/ that seems to be a good approach in order to get this job done without interruption.

Hope it helps you!
July 13th, 2015 7:11am

This topic is archived. No further replies will be accepted.

Other recent topics Other recent topics