confidential level design
thanks let me ask it in right column
October 5th, 2012 10:00am

thanks. when you say "Having it based on metadata might be difficult. Item level permissions or different libraries would be most secure but harder to manage". what are the challenges can the view secure it from being search
Free Windows Admin Tool Kit Click here and download it now
October 5th, 2012 10:22am

thanks. when you say "Having it based on metadata might be difficult. Item level permissions or different libraries would be most secure but harder to manage". what are the challenges can the view secure it from being search
October 5th, 2012 10:22am

You can library settings to stop it being searched. I mean that if you use views to secure it, it isn't really SECURE, it can be circumvented. Therefore I suggest you use proper SharePoint permissions. However per item permissions for example are a pain to manage. So, without some sort of extra solution being written or bought I suggest putting the different documents in different libraries and securing the whole library with each permission needed.w: http://www.the-north.com/sharepoint | t: @JMcAllisterCH | c: http://www.b-i.com
Free Windows Admin Tool Kit Click here and download it now
October 5th, 2012 11:00am

You can library settings to stop it being searched. I mean that if you use views to secure it, it isn't really SECURE, it can be circumvented. Therefore I suggest you use proper SharePoint permissions. However per item permissions for example are a pain to manage. So, without some sort of extra solution being written or bought I suggest putting the different documents in different libraries and securing the whole library with each permission needed.w: http://www.the-north.com/sharepoint | t: @JMcAllisterCH | c: http://www.b-i.com
October 5th, 2012 11:00am

Hi my project requirement is that user should have access to reports in a document library based on their confidentiallity level. am thinking of having confidentiality level as a metadata on the document library. have a list of users with confidentiality level and programmaticaly assign each user permission to the items in the document on itemadded event i dont know if this will work or any other better design Thanks
Free Windows Admin Tool Kit Click here and download it now
October 6th, 2012 8:18pm

Having it based on metadata might be difficult. Item level permissions or different libraries would be most secure but harder to manage. Per Location Views can be used to work with Metadata so that might be a solution, only items with certain metadata would be shown there. You can also secure the views (it's something of a hack) and ensure only certain users can see certain items. But if this truly needs to be secure, Item level permissions or (preferably from a management standpoint)different libraries are going to be best.w: http://www.the-north.com/sharepoint | t: @JMcAllisterCH | c: http://www.b-i.com
October 6th, 2012 8:35pm

By the way talking about metadata that means this is a SharePoint 2010 question right? As such it's in the wrong forum - this forum is pre-2010...w: http://www.the-north.com/sharepoint | t: @JMcAllisterCH | c: http://www.b-i.com
Free Windows Admin Tool Kit Click here and download it now
October 6th, 2012 8:39pm

Hi anelkab, We can download the Useful SharePoint Designer Custom Workflow Activities from CodePlex. This project provides some custom workflow activities to manager permissions for item level. http://spdactivities.codeplex.com/wikipage?title=Available%20Activities Then, instead of use event receiver, you can also use SharePoint Designer workflow. Thanks & Regards, Emir Liu TechNet Subscriber Support in forum If you have any feedback on our support, please contact tnmff@microsoft.com. Emir Liu TechNet Community Support
October 8th, 2012 2:13am

Will i need to install this package in the production server or only on the development server
Free Windows Admin Tool Kit Click here and download it now
October 11th, 2012 8:09am

The WF activities would need to go into all environments where they were used. :/w: http://www.the-north.com/sharepoint | t: @JMcAllisterCH | c: http://www.b-i.com
October 11th, 2012 8:30am

This topic is archived. No further replies will be accepted.

Other recent topics Other recent topics