After reviewing this section of the DPM documentation, I'm trying to figure out whether or not my currently envisioned configuration is sane. Specifically, I want to use chaining (not cyclic protection), but I don't want to include all data in all steps of the chain. The configuration would be something like this:
Server 1 (primary backup for all on-site data except own system state / BMR):
- Primary DPM Server
- 2+TB DPM Storage Pool
- 2+TB Data backed up from Several Clients Including Local Non-System-State Data
Server 2 (solely to provide onsite BMR to Server 1):
- Secondary DPM Server to Server 1
- 250GB DPM Storage Pool for Server 1 System State / BMR Only
Server 3 (offsite over VPN to provide redundancy in case of loss of site):
- Secondary DPM Server to Server 2
- 2+TB DPM Storage Pool for Server 2 System State / BMR, Server 2 DPM Storage Pool (including Server 1 System State / BMR), and Server 1 DPM Storage Pool
So my question in more specific detail: is this configuration sane, or would Server 2 need a 2+TB DPM Storage Pool to include the Server 1 DPM Storage Pool in order for Server 3 to be able to back it up as well?
- Edited by PRDIT 17 hours 55 minutes ago Added line breaks for missing paragraph spacing.
- Moved by Mike JacquetMicrosoft employee, Moderator 11 hours 0 minutes ago