No Primary Site code on Windows 7 SP1 64 bit
So here is my deal...
I have deployed Windows 7 sp1 32bit and 64 bit on computers at a secondary site. The 32bit machines get the primary site code fine and show up in the SCCM console as they should. The 64bit machines do not get the primary site code and show
up with a site code of the secondary server in the console. I can go to a 64bit machine, open the client config manager and see that the site code is empty. If I click discover it finds the primary site and all is good. I would like
to avoid doing this step, has anyone ran into anything like this?
Did I miss a setting or something somewhere?
May 27th, 2011 4:02pm
How are you deploying the systems and the client agent?Jason | http://myitforum.com/cs2/blogs/jsandys | Twitter @JasonSandys
Free Windows Admin Tool Kit Click here and download it now
May 27th, 2011 5:32pm
You have a problem with the assignment process. Check the clientlocation.log and locationsservices.log on the clients in the remote location. Make sure they can query AD for a MP and SLP.Kent Agerlund | My blogs: http://blog.coretech.dk/author/kea/ and http://scug.dk/ | Twitter @Agerlund | Linkedin: /kentagerlund
May 28th, 2011 2:24am
You have a problem with the assignment process. Check the clientlocation.log and locationsservices.log on the clients in the remote location. Make sure they can query AD for a MP and SLP.Kent Agerlund | My blogs: http://blog.coretech.dk/author/kea/ and http://scug.dk/ | Twitter @Agerlund | Linkedin: /kentagerlund
Free Windows Admin Tool Kit Click here and download it now
May 28th, 2011 2:24am
Hi,
You may
create a new custom task directly after "Setup windows and ConfigMgr" which calls a VB script (see example)
to rediscover the site code:
Set oSMSClient = CreateObject ("Microsoft.SMS.Client")
Set objWMIService = GetObject("winmgmts:" & "\\" & "." & "\root\ccm")
Set objPendingAssg = objWMIService.Get("SMS_PendingSiteAssignment=@")
' quit script if instance does not exist
if Err.Number<>0 then
wscript.quit
end if
objPendingAssg.Delete_
oSMSClient.RemoveAssignedSites
sNewSite=oSMSClient.AutoDiscoverSite
oSMSClient.SetAssignedSite sNewSite,0
Regards,
Sabrina
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties or guarantees, and confers no rights. |Please remember to click Mark as Answer on the post that helps you, and to click Unmark as Answer if a marked post does not actually answer your question.
This can be beneficial to other community members reading the thread.
May 31st, 2011 8:03am
Systems and client are being deployed with a task sequence.
Free Windows Admin Tool Kit Click here and download it now
May 31st, 2011 11:48am
Both of those logs show errors about it not being able to find the mp, I think it is error 5, sorry not at a machine that has this issue right not. I know the other log shows that it is looking over and over for the new site code. I just don't
understand why it only happens on the 64 bit machines.
May 31st, 2011 11:51am
You have a problem with the assignment process. Check the clientlocation.log and locationsservices.log on the clients in the remote location. Make sure they can query AD for a MP and SLP.
Kent Agerlund | My blogs: http://blog.coretech.dk/author/kea/ and http://scug.dk/ | Twitter @Agerlund | Linkedin: /kentagerlund
I get that, my question is why only on the 64bit computers the x86 computers aren't having the issue.
Free Windows Admin Tool Kit Click here and download it now
June 1st, 2011 4:57pm
How are you deploying these systems?
The actual client agent differs only slightly between the two architectures so it's not a problem with the client itself and of course your back-end is the same and ConfigMgr doesn't do anything different for different client architectures. That leaves one
thing, your OS deployment process.Jason | http://myitforum.com/cs2/blogs/jsandys | Twitter @JasonSandys
June 1st, 2011 5:02pm
How are you deploying these systems?
The actual client agent differs only slightly between the two architectures so it's not a problem with the client itself and of course your back-end is the same and ConfigMgr doesn't do anything different for different client architectures. That leaves one
thing, your OS deployment process.Jason | http://myitforum.com/cs2/blogs/jsandys | Twitter @JasonSandys
Free Windows Admin Tool Kit Click here and download it now
June 1st, 2011 5:02pm
How are you deploying these systems?
The actual client agent differs only slightly between the two architectures so it's not a problem with the client itself and of course your back-end is the same and ConfigMgr doesn't do anything different for different client architectures. That leaves one
thing, your OS deployment process.
Jason | http://myitforum.com/cs2/blogs/jsandys | Twitter @JasonSandys
The systems are being deployed through pxe with a task sequence using a captured image.
June 1st, 2011 5:12pm
How are you deploying these systems?
The actual client agent differs only slightly between the two architectures so it's not a problem with the client itself and of course your back-end is the same and ConfigMgr doesn't do anything different for different client architectures. That leaves one
thing, your OS deployment process.
Jason | http://myitforum.com/cs2/blogs/jsandys | Twitter @JasonSandys
The systems are being deployed through pxe with a task sequence using a captured image.
Free Windows Admin Tool Kit Click here and download it now
June 1st, 2011 5:12pm
How did you create your captured image?
Have you tried a clean or new x64 image?Jason | http://myitforum.com/cs2/blogs/jsandys | Twitter @JasonSandys
June 1st, 2011 5:16pm
How did you create your captured image?
Have you tried a clean or new x64 image?Jason | http://myitforum.com/cs2/blogs/jsandys | Twitter @JasonSandys
Free Windows Admin Tool Kit Click here and download it now
June 1st, 2011 5:16pm
How did you create your captured image?
Have you tried a clean or new x64 image?
Jason | http://myitforum.com/cs2/blogs/jsandys | Twitter @JasonSandys
We created the image through a task sequence, and creating and trying another one is about the only thing we haven't tried.
June 1st, 2011 5:20pm