Yeah, okay Created/Modified are probably special (and therefore a bad example) but I was just trying to give an example of a field that is IN (all?) lists and libraries (because its a site column?) don't want to modify them (create/mod), but others yes-
ie ones we've created... perhaps this is why they don't show up in the "refreshed" fields... perhaps only modifyable fields show up there?
Anyway, I can CREATE a secondary connection "read" from the same list - to get created/modified (for display purposes), so I was just wondering if there is a way to do this...
>> Create form -> publish -> Add Site Column "Bob" -> Modify Form to handle bob
Failing that I do understand the differences between the "behaviour" or "restrictions" of InfoPath rules and workflow steps, but I am struggling to grok the whys and wherefores around how to manipulate one from the other and keep things
in sync.
eg:
form is filled in by InfoPath by user (InfoPath)
approval notifications is send from item creation in list/library(workflow - "on create")
user must use the form to review and "approve/reject" the form, so how do you put a button in the InfoPath to allow an approval to be completed?
(FYI I have put in a very hacky temp workflow that appears to do the job (the workflow looks to promoted InfoPath fields for "step indicators", but I thought it would be much easier to use the "approval workflow" but force the use to
review the document in InfoPath... otherwise its easy for the InfoPath to set data and rules that also need to be either worked around or duplicated/syncd in the workflow...)
From everything I've read the "process" needs to go like this:
notification "you have been assigned an approval task" -> open in SP or outlook
user is presented "name/date/comment/approve/reject (and more - reassign, etc)"
but user still needs to also open the item (InfoPath) close the item and find the approval and approve it...
this is a clunky workflow my users are unhappy with, so adding an approval button (and comments field) into the InfoPath form makes sense, but is more difficult than I could easily figure out...
This is where I'm coming from with this line of questi