Hello All, I have a situation which is forcing me to use the rules extension to meet the need. I would like to understand if this can work together with Codeless Provisioning. Situation: The code-less provisioning doesn't have any means to provide a computed attribute as a Relationship Criteria for In-bound Synchronization. The other alternative is to use a Rules Extension to compute the value of an attribute which will then be used for join and projection operation. Question: Having said that, is there any way a Synchronization Rule created in FIM-WS use the Rules Extension based join/projection criteria defined at the FIM Sync Service layer? Result: If this is not supported, then I am afraid the Code-less Provisioning cannot be mixed with Rules Extensions. It may be mutually exclusive. In other words, if I use Rules Extension for join/projection criteria then I will have to define the attribute flow in FIM Synchronization Service as against in FIM Portal/Service. Appreciate your help, Thanks, Thanks & Regards, Jameel Syed Principal Consultant, fimGuru - Your window into simplified identities jameel.syed@fimguru.com - http://www.fimguru.com

You can mix it: http://blogs.technet.com/b/doittoit/archive/2008/11/18/hybrids-not-just-for-you-prius-fans.aspx . //HenrikHenrik Nilsson, ILM/FIM MVP Blog: http://www.idmcrisis.com Company: Cortego (http://www.cortego.se)

Henrik, Thanks for pointing this out. I must say this capability makes FIM quite powerful and flexible. I will try it out and reach back to this forum if needed. Thanks, JameelThanks & Regards, Jameel Syed Principal Consultant, fimGuru - Your window into simplified identities jameel.syed@fimguru.com - http://www.fimguru.com