Could not provision email to the user
Hi Experts for FIM2010,i could not do email provisioning to the users added to through protal. While configuring AD MA i checked Enable Exchange 2007 Provisioning. but still could not so it. no error is there so that i can investigate it. please let me know if i missed anything more.Cheers, Mohit Goyal
October 23rd, 2009 2:14pm

Hi Mohit,have you installed the Exchange 2007 management console on the ILM machine? If not, you should get an extension-dll-exception error when you try to export the users to AD.Howhave you configured the homeMDB attribute in your export flow? CheersPaolo Tedesco - http://espace.cern.ch/idm
Free Windows Admin Tool Kit Click here and download it now
October 23rd, 2009 4:03pm

Hi Paolo, I had installed Exchange 2007 Management Console on the FIM2010 Machine also i picked homeMDB value from AD via ADSIedit.exe and configured it to Outbound sync rule with destination to homeMDB is there any thing else i missed. Please help me.Cheers, Mohit Goyal
October 28th, 2009 1:48pm

Do you have a outbound sync rule set up to provision the user in AD with mailnickname flow out to AD from FIM? And an inbound rule to sync the email attribute back in from AD to FIM? Please also check the flow. You should see:1. Flow for mailNickName as FIM->FIM CS->MV->AD CS-> AD2. Email address asAD->AD CS->MV->FIM CS-> FIMIs your user provisioned correctly in AD? and is the user mailbox being created as a result?Elisa Zhang
Free Windows Admin Tool Kit Click here and download it now
November 10th, 2009 12:03am

Hi...In your synchronization rule ->outbound attribute flow , try to useTRIM function in flow definition to your homeMDB. TRIM("CN=Mailbox Database,CN=First Storage Group,CN=InformationStore,CN=Server01,CN=Servers,CN=Exchange Administrative Group (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT),CN=Administrative Groups,CN=First Organization,CN=Microsoft Exchange,CN=Services,CN=Configuration,DC=litware,DC=com") => homeMDBcheck if your flow definition to mDBUseDefaults is "true" (string) and your mailnickname is valid.Cherrs,Paulo
November 13th, 2009 4:11pm

This topic is archived. No further replies will be accepted.

Other recent topics Other recent topics