Our organisation deploys all clients with CCMLOGLEVEL=0 being the most verbose. Is this really required for detailed troubleshooting? Or is another level perfectly adequate? Thanks David Z

Hi, It's not required but just to provide more additional informations on error conditions for clients and 0 is the most verbose logging. Otherwise: 1 to log only informational, warning, and error messages. 2 to log only warning and error messages. 3 to log only error messages. Bechir Gharbi | http://myitforum.com/myitforumwp/community/members/bgharbi/ | Time zone : GMT+1

Is this really required for detailed troubleshooting? It is required for detailed troubleshooting, but not for troubleshooting ;-) Most problems can be solved with standard logging. I had to use verbose logging only in a very small percentage (<1%). Torsten Meringer | http://www.mssccmfaq.de