Bad connection to 82.178.158.24

Hi

I'm connected to internet but my connection to i.answers.microsoft.com 82.178.158.24 is not good.

Please help me.

ping www.microsoft.com -t

Pinging e10088.dspb.akamaiedge.net [104.86.229.95] with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 104.86.229.95: bytes=32 time=220ms TTL=42
Reply from 104.86.229.95: bytes=32 time=227ms TTL=42
Reply from 104.86.229.95: bytes=32 time=222ms TTL=42
Reply from 104.86.229.95: bytes=32 time=221ms TTL=42
Reply from 104.86.229.95: bytes=32 time=220ms TTL=42
Reply from 104.86.229.95: bytes=32 time=221ms TTL=42
Reply from 104.86.229.95: bytes=32 time=220ms TTL=42
Reply from 104.86.229.95: bytes=32 time=220ms TTL=42

Ping statistics for 104.86.229.95:
    Packets: Sent = 8, Received = 8, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 220ms, Maximum = 227ms, Average = 221ms

-------------

Ping statistics for 82.178.158.24:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 2, Lost = 2 (50% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 191ms, Maximum = 192ms, Average = 191ms

April 20th, 2015 5:41am

>tracert 82.178.158.24

Tracing route to i24.158.178.82.omantel.net.om [82.178.158.24]
over a maximum of 30 hops:

  1     2 ms     1 ms    10 ms  192.168.100.1
  2    <1 ms     2 ms    <1 ms  hotspot.k***.net [172.16.3.2]
  3     1 ms    <1 ms     1 ms  172.16.16.1
  4     2 ms     1 ms     3 ms 
  5     9 ms     3 ms     4 ms  192.168.59.22
  6    10 ms     3 ms     3 ms  192.168.48.25
  7     *        *       14 ms  ***
  8     7 ms     6 ms     4 ms  ***
  9    10 ms     9 ms     5 ms  80.71.115.78
 10     6 ms     9 ms     3 ms  ***
 11     4 ms     6 ms   121 ms  ***
 12     9 ms     4 ms     4 ms  ***
 13     8 ms     4 ms     4 ms  ***
 14    10 ms     5 ms     5 ms  ***
 15     5 ms     5 ms     4 ms  ***
 16     *        5 ms    11 ms  ***
 17     6 ms     6 ms     6 ms  ***
 18     6 ms     5 ms     5 ms  ***
 19     *      175 ms   173 ms  so-3-0-0-xcr1-mar.cw.net [195.10.54.193]
 20   180 ms   180 ms   177 ms  ae7-xcr1.prp.cw.net [195.2.10.53]
 21   176 ms   174 ms   173 ms  ae8-xcr1.bkl.cw.net [195.2.9.193]
 22   180 ms   175 ms   174 ms  ae3-xcr2.lnd.cw.net [195.2.30.165]
 23   174 ms   175 ms   179 ms  ae0-xcr1.lnd.cw.net [195.2.25.121]
 24   174 ms   174 ms     *     ae6-xcr1.lsw.cw.net [195.2.25.29]
 25     *        *      176 ms  oteglobal-gw.lsw.cw.net [166.63.211.186]
 26     *        *        *     Request timed out.
 27   174 ms   170 ms   171 ms  gig4-1.50-gsr03-hellasat.ath.oteglobe.gr [62.75.
3.242]
 28   177 ms   182 ms   187 ms  i24.158.178.82.omantel.net.om [82.178.158.24]

Trace complete.

------------

>ping 195.2.25.29 -t

Pinging 195.2.25.29 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 195.2.25.29: bytes=32 time=166ms TTL=46
Reply from 195.2.25.29: bytes=32 time=166ms TTL=46
Reply from 195.2.25.29: bytes=32 time=164ms TTL=46
Reply from 195.2.25.29: bytes=32 time=165ms TTL=46
Reply from 195.2.25.29: bytes=32 time=176ms TTL=46
Reply from 195.2.25.29: bytes=32 time=167ms TTL=46
Reply from 195.2.25.29: bytes=32 time=167ms TTL=46
Reply from 195.2.25.29: bytes=32 time=166ms TTL=46
Reply from 195.2.25.29: bytes=32 time=179ms TTL=46
Reply from 195.2.25.29: bytes=32 time=165ms TTL=46
Reply from 195.2.25.29: bytes=32 time=166ms TTL=46

Ping statistics for 195.2.25.29:
    Packets: Sent = 11, Received = 11, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 164ms, Maximum = 179ms, Average = 167ms


  • Edited by hsadry Monday, April 20, 2015 6:36 AM IPs
Free Windows Admin Tool Kit Click here and download it now
April 20th, 2015 6:01am

Hi hsadry,

I have tried to both ping 195.2.25.29 and tracert 82.178.158.24.
The connection is bad or even worse than yours .

As far as I kown ,there are so many connections to be resolved at the same time and the server will respond a little slow ,it is a normal symptom .
Fortunately ,all the packages have been resolved and it won`t affect our surfering experience .

Best regards

April 21st, 2015 9:14am

Hi MeipoXu

Your connection to   i.answers.microsoft.com 82.178.158.24 has no "packet loss". but my connection has over 15% packe loss

Reply from 82.178.158.24: bytes=32 time=159ms TTL=48
Reply from 82.178.158.24: bytes=32 time=161ms TTL=48
Reply from 82.178.158.24: bytes=32 time=158ms TTL=48
Reply from 82.178.158.24: bytes=32 time=161ms TTL=48
Request timed out.
Request timed out.
Reply from 82.178.158.24: bytes=32 time=163ms TTL=48
Reply from 82.178.158.24: bytes=32 time=158ms TTL=48
Reply from 82.178.158.24: bytes=32 time=161ms TTL=48
Reply from 82.178.158.24: bytes=32 time=161ms TTL=48
Reply from 82.178.158.24: bytes=32 time=160ms TTL=48
Reply from 82.178.158.24: bytes=32 time=159ms TTL=48
Reply from 82.178.158.24: bytes=32 time=162ms TTL=48
Reply from 82.178.158.24: bytes=32 time=158ms TTL=48
Reply from 82.178.158.24: bytes=32 time=158ms TTL=48
Reply from 82.178.158.24: bytes=32 time=158ms TTL=48
Reply from 82.178.158.24: bytes=32 time=176ms TTL=48
Reply from 82.178.158.24: bytes=32 time=160ms TTL=48

Ping statistics for 82.178.158.24:
    Packets: Sent = 634, Received = 532, Lost = 102 (16% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 158ms, Maximum = 583ms, Average = 163ms

so I could not open http://answers.microsoft.com website

answers.microsoft.com

Please help

Free Windows Admin Tool Kit Click here and download it now
April 23rd, 2015 9:52am

Hi Hsadry,

Will the issue occur all the time ?Can we open the other websites correctly ?

According the reply you posted before ,it seems that we won`t lose package all the time .

We can try to open the http://answers.microsoft.com website from other browser like Internet Explorer to have a check .

Best r

April 27th, 2015 10:30pm

Hi

Website problem is now solved.

But packet loss problem on 82.178.158.24 is remaining. In all of my posts, this packet loss is visible.

The server that has not any packet loss, is: 195.2.25.29 so my internet connection is good.

I have problem in 82.178.158.24

Thanks

Free Windows Admin Tool Kit Click here and download it now
April 28th, 2015 3:36am

This topic is archived. No further replies will be accepted.

Other recent topics Other recent topics